December 2, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court to "conference" on Obama citizenship question

Washington, DC -- According to the U.S. Constitution, a person must be a "natural born citizen" in order to be eligible to become President of the United States. In fact, President is the ONLY office in the entire USA that is not open to immigrants who become citizens of the US. A President MUST be a natural born citizen.

As you may have heard over the past year, there are serious questions as to where Barack Obama was born.

Obama claims he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii but it appears he was born in Kenya.

According to various sources, Obama's mother was denied permission to fly back to Hawaii from Kenya because she was at such a late stage of pregnancy. Airlines do not allow pregnant women to fly if there's a chance they will give birth during the flight.

According to Obama family members who live in Kenya, they witnessed Barack being born in a hospital in Kenya, after which his mother and he were flown to Hawaii.

According to U.S. law, the child of AMERICAN PARENTS (two) is automatically a US Citizen if born abroad. While Barack Obama's mother was American, his father was not; the father was Kenyan. As such, Barack did not qualify for, and did not get, automatic US citizenship.

Upon the family's return to Hawaii, they could have filed a declaration of US Citizenship for Barack, but they did not.

Later in his life, Obama's family moved to Indonesia where they registered Barack to attend a Muslim school. On the application for that school, Obama's family listed Barack's citizenship as "Indonesian."

Needless to say, these issues have raised legitimate questions as to whether or not Barack Obama is legally qualified to become President of the United States.

The issue of Obama's citizenship was raised long before the November election. Citizens in several states filed lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama's citizenship but arrogant, condescending Judges in several different states threw out those lawsuits. In at least one case, a State Judge ruled that citizens "do not have legal standing" to enforce the Constitution.

A couple of the people whose lawsuits were dismissed by state judges, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has scheduled a conference of the nine justices to consider whether or not the court will review those lawsuits. The conference is scheduled for this Friday, December 5.

If a majority of Supreme Court Justices vote to hear the case, they will schedule a hearing and decide the issue. If a majority votes against hearing the case, the lower court rulings, stand.

Here's where things get dicey.

The questions surrounding the citizenship and "natural born" status of Barack Obama are legitimate on their face.

If the Supreme Court refuses to review the lower court decisions, we will be a nation without proof that our President is constitutionally qualified to hold that office! This would be intolerable.

By allowing the lower court rulings to stand, the government will also have officially ruled that citizens do not have the right to enforce their own Constitution! That would be a usurpation of the inherent political power of We The People. This too would be intolerable.

Left with no way to enforce our own Constitution, those of us who are using every peaceful, lawful method available to redress the issue, will have been betrayed by our own public servants. At that moment, we will be left with no choice but to invoke our original right of self defense. (See Federalist 28, Par. 6)

If you aren't sure what I mean when I say "original right of self defense" I mean the exact same thing as one of our Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton, meant when he wrote Federalist 28:

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. . . . . . The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.

Just so we're clear on this, invoking our original right of self defense means using force and violence. Attacking and destroying the government which has usurped us.

The other possibility is that the nine Justices vote to review the lower court decisions.

If they vote to review the lawsuits, Obama will have to prove he is legally qualified to become President and the Supreme Court will issue a ruling on the case.

If Obama can prove he's a natural born citizen, the case will be closed, the issue settled and life will go on. I doubt Obama can prove it because the facts speak for themselves.

If Obama is not a "natural born" citizen, things will get REALLY dicey, really fast.

If the court finds Obama is not "natural born" they can rule a couple ways:

1) They can rule that Obama is ineligible to be President. This is my preference for two reasons:
a) I just cannot fathom allowing a mongrelized jigaboo in the most powerful political office in the world while his chimpette-looking wife and little pikaninnies stink up the White house, AND;
b) It will cause an immediate, violent uprsing by "you know who." Cities will burn as you-know-who throws another of their violent temper tantrums and while that's happening, guys like me will have fantastic opportunity to open fire in a target-rich, chaotic environment.

2) They might rule that Obama was not "natural born" but that the natural born provision in the Constitution doesn't apply anymore. This would be the worst thing they could do because such a ruling would be a defacto AMENDMENT to the Constitution and the Supreme Court is not empowered to make Amendments. If the Justices rule the provision no longer applies, they may as well paint a bulls-eye on their own foreheads. ***

3) They can rule that Obama was not natural born but . . . . the law granting automatic citizenship to a child of American parents (two), really means ONE parent. Since Obama's mom was American, he has citizenship, end of case.

In closing, we are heading for a very dangerous situation. If the courts refuse to review the dismissed lawsuits, they should not be surprised if We The People attack and destroy the government for usurping our power.

If the courts agree to review the dismissed lawsuits and rule that Obama is not eligible, I would not be surprised if the Blacks and Hispanics attack and destroy the government.

If the courts make a defacto Amendment to the Constitution by saying the "natural born" provision is antiquated, unnecessary or any other horseshit, they should not be surprised if we Constitutionalists grab them and kill them.

Of course, the Justices on the Supreme Court are a sly lot. They may find other, perhaps more creative ways to rule, but for me, the possibilities above seem to cover the most probable rulings and most probable reactions.


*** I'm a simple guy. Tell me what the rules are, apply those rules to everyone equally and I am a happy camper. However, if you tell me what the rules are then apply them to only some of us or just throw them away when it suits you, I am not a happy camper. When I'm not happy, bad things happen.

You see, I learned a lot from American blacks during my 46 years on this planet. When they are not happy, they riot, pillage, burn and kill. After they riot, pillage, burn and kill, they get what they want! We saw it after the Rodney King riots in LA, we saw it in the Civil Rights riots throughout the south in the 1960's, we saw it in the race riots in Boston, New York, Newark and Detroit in the 1970's.

The lesson I took away from those things is: VIOLENCE WORKS! So when I talk about using force and violence, it's not irrational or emotional; it's cold logic.